In a peer-reviewed commentary printed in npj Digital Medicine, consultants from Regenstrief Institute, Mayo Clinic and The Pew Charitable Trusts write that matching patient data from disparate sources just isn’t solely achievable, however elementary to stem the tide of the present pandemic and permit for quick motion for future extremely contagious viruses.
Specifically, fast identification of COVID-19 contaminated and at-risk people and the success of future large-scale vaccination efforts in the United States will rely, partly, on how successfully a person’s digital well being information is securely shared amongst healthcare providers, care settings together with hospitals and pharmacies, and different techniques used to trace the sickness and immunization.
For information sharing to be efficient, electronic health records (EHRs)—each these held inside a single facility and people in several healthcare organizations—should accurately confer with a selected particular person. Is Billy Jones recognized at a distinct physician’s workplace as William Jones and are all his well being data linked? To which Maria Garcia do lab check outcomes belong? Which John Smith was referred to throughout contact tracing?
Unfortunately, the commentary notes, patient matching charges fluctuate extensively, with healthcare services failing to hyperlink data for the identical patient as typically as half the time. Authors Shaun Grannis, M.D., vice president for information and analytics at Regenstrief Institute and Regenstrief Professor of Medical Informatics at Indiana University School of Medicine; John D. Halamka, M.D., president of Mayo Clinic Platform and Ben Moscovitch, director of The Pew Charitable Trusts’ well being info know-how initiative, name for stakeholders to urgently tackle the patient matching conundrum. Otherwise, the commentary says, efforts to curtail the present pandemic and future ones will probably be ill-advisedly delayed.
“…the sharing of more data and use of standards—reflect near-term opportunities that government and health care organizations can implement to respond to the current pandemic and prepare for future ones. In the longer term, there may be other opportunities—such as use of biometrics, unique identifiers, or multi-factor authentication—that could further enhance patient identification and matching, including for routine care. However, those options—and the associated standards that underlie their success—while worthwhile to examine, cannot be designed, deployed, and implemented in a near-term manner that could help mitigate the effects of this pandemic,” the commentary states.
Ben Moscovitch et al, Better patient identification could help fight the coronavirus, npj Digital Medicine (2020). DOI: 10.1038/s41746-020-0289-4
Better patient identification could help fight the coronavirus (2020, June 2)
retrieved 10 June 2020
This doc is topic to copyright. Apart from any honest dealing for the objective of personal research or analysis, no
half could also be reproduced with out the written permission. The content material is offered for info functions solely.